i L i n d . n e t

Ian Lind online daily from Kaaawa, Hawaii

i L i n d . n e t header image 1



Ooops…down the electronic drain

September 2nd, 2010 · Blogs, Cats

I managed to accidentally delete today’s main entry just before it was ready to publish and right before our 6 a.m. walk.

Don’t ask how.

I saw it happen with one of those, “Oh, no!” moments.

I’ll be able recreate it, but not until I get into town later this morning.

Since getting back from the walk, I’ve been going through my twice-a-day routine with Duke.

He gets a dish of canned food and encouragement to eat, which sometimes just involves an encouraging word, other times requires a few strategic strokes with brush or hand. Usually we’re in the bedroom with the door closed to keep the other cats out. They don’t get canned food in the morning and are not happy about the discrimination.

In any case, after Duke eats his fill, I sit down with the brush and groom him. He likes his face brushed, and his head, and, well, all body parts. He usually starts purring right about now.

With luck, he just settles down. While still brushing, I pinch a place on his shoulders, reach for the syringe with his dose of insulin, and manage the injection in one smooth stroke. Most times, he doesn’t notice the needle. He does notice the disruption of the brushing/petting.

After he’s gotten his insulin, I wrap up the grooming session. He usually finishes cleaning and then goes to sleep. I can open the door and let other cats in to clean up any leftover food.

All this isn’t hard, but it takes some time. Twice a day. We’ve been at it for several weeks. So far, so good.

Unfortunately, though, it takes precedence over necessary blog rewrites, as this morning.

So have patience. The rewrite is coming.

→ No CommentsTags:

Drug testing at the Star-Advertiser?

September 2nd, 2010 · Media, Politics

Drug testing of reporters at the Star-Advertiser? Or just my misunderstanding?

Did you happen to see PBS Hawaii’s Leahey & Leahey last night, with guest Stephen Tsai?

This weekly program features father & son team, Jim Leahey and Kanoa Leahey in a 30-minute discussion of local sports that often wanders in political and social commentary. It’s always a well-done piece of local programming.

They introduced Tsai as the top Star-Advertiser reporter on the UH football beat.

Tsai responded that he had just taken a drug test (did he say “drug test” or “blood test”?) and hoped that his job at the Star-Advertiser is secure. It was said in a joking manner, but it didn’t seem to be a joke. However, I have to leave the door open because I haven’t heard anything else about such testing, which would likely raise a fuss. Hopefully I just misunderstood.

And I don’t see anything concerning drug testing on the Hawaii Newspaper Guild web site. Actually, the transition to the Star-Advertiser isn’t yet reflected there. Instead, there are still links to the Star-Bulletin and Advertiser. I suppose this reflects some disarray as the Guild goes through merger talks of its own.

→ 6 CommentsTags: ·

No wife, he said.

September 1st, 2010 · Aging & dementia

It’s been over a month since my dad’s brush with pneumonia. We were all lucky, I suppose. He survived, despite the bad reaction to antibiotics, and has been been on a long, slow recovery trajectory.

For several weeks, he was just exhausted. Slept a lot. I admit to visiting less.

In the past couple of weeks, his physical health and mental condition have been on separate tracks. Sometimes they are running parallel, sometimes there’s a big divergence. And things seem to change quickly. I think of that image of the wobbling track of a hurricane, like a bottle in a current. It’s on a general track in one direction, but it wobbles along that track in a way that can create significant differences.

When I stopped to see him early last week, he was in bed, but agitated and very upset. He wanted to know if I had heard anything about “what’s happening.”

“No,” I replied cautiously, not knowing what he was talking about.

Then it came right out.

“When I got home last night,” he said, serious, making eye contact with me. “I didn’t have a wife. She was gone. She moved out on me. I think she moved in with Bonnie.”

“Home” is in Kahala, the house where my parents lived since somewhere around the beginning of WWII. He hasn’t been home, at least not physically, since a couple of days before Thanksgiving in 2008. Bonnie is my sister. She’s been living with my mom in Kahala to assist since before my dad ended up in this nursing home.

He was very worried about the situation and my mother’s absence.

“I don’t understand why she didn’t call,” he said.

Okay, I can understand that, at some level, he’s worried she hasn’t been here to visit very often. She’s at home dealing with her own mobility and health issues, and getting to his bed on the third floor of the nursing home becomes a major expedition.

Then it got worse.

“There was a Japanese guy in the kitchen, and he looked like he had been invited.”

All this took me by surprise, and I really didn’t know how to respond. I think I told him that one of her club meetings probably just ran a little long, but that I would check it out.

He closed his eyes again for a minute or so, then looked up at me.

“I pulled out a couple of chafing dishes, just in case,” he said, then launched into an explanation of how these can be used for warming, or for steaming, like a double boiler.

This is something he would have done back when he ran his own restaurant supply company. He would pull stuff out of their inventory for various needs. Last minute Christmas gifts? Head for the stockroom. Birthday? Pull out a frying pan. Today he spoke as if he really had just opened a few boxes and dug out their contents. Just in case.

Meanwhile, I was trying to guess the source of the brain short-circuit leading to the sighting of a Japanese man “in the kitchen.”

Did he catch sight of the man in the next bed, which he continually forgets is there? Did a new nursing assistant deliver his meal? I never did quite figure that one out.

Despite floating in the fantasy zone, he surprised me with a couple of other mental jumps that showed his brain can make connections. When I mentioned that one of Meda’s sisters is moving to a home in Menlo Park, California, he quickly pointed out his cousin, Bill Fairley, had lived in Menlo Park. And then he remembered the name of one of the people in an old photo I showed him on my previous visit. In the picture with my dad were Duke Kahanamoku, Dad Center, and several other unidentified men.

“Ward Brewster.” I didn’t know what he was talking about. “Ward Brewster, I think he was the short guy in the picture. He was around the beach a lot.”

He remembered the photo, and added another name to it.

Then Bob, the 3rd floor nursing supervisor, stopped in.

My dad called out cheerfully, “Hello, Paul!”

He thinks that he’s talking to Paul, who apparently welcomed people to the old Commercial Club in downtown Honolulu. The business club was upstairs from the Dohrmann Hotel Supply Company, where my dad worked from the time he arrived in Honolulu in 1939.

Bob knows the story, and doesn’t mind at all being “Paul”.

Another day, another visit. On this afternoon, I found him in bed, but his voice was clear and strong. His mind, though, was someplace else.

He greeted me by name, but that was the high point.

He closed his eyes.

Opened them.

Asked me if my friend was still visiting.

I didn’t know what he was talking about, but didn’t want to argue.

So I said, no, they’re gone.

He asked: “Did she leave yesterday?”

She? Again, I was winging it.

“No, earlier in the week,” I sputtered.

He asks: “When does your wife get back?”

Oh, oh. I tell the truth.

“She wasn’t gone. She’s been here.”

He looked at me.

Closed his eyes.

Opened his eyes.

“Who’s the guy having all that fun?”

I ask, puzzled, “which guy?”

“The one on the golf course,” pointing across the room towards the hall.

I had to just say that I didn’t know.

Then, trying to say something more, he managed only a few slurred words. I couldn’t tell whether this was the sleep, vague state of mind, or another micro stroke, of which he apparently has had many.

He had lunch in front of him and, when he next opened his eyes, was surprised to see it.

He asked: “How long has that been here?”

Then: “Was I here when it came in?”

It took several seconds, then he understood that he must have been there, since he was in the bed and apparently hadn’t been anywhere in a while.

He looked at the food, but didn’t eat anything.

Then he closed his eyes again and was asleep.

And so we continue on this winding path.

→ 6 CommentsTags:

Heavy weight cats

September 1st, 2010 · Cats

We recently invested in a scale so that we can keep track of the cats’ weights.

Here are the results of yesterday’s weigh-in: 113 pounds of feline fun!

[text]

No, I don’t know why Ms. Annie is so far off the statistical norm. She seems to eat as much as any of the others. But she is the most active, meaning that she spends part of every day out hunting. And Harriet’s just about a perfect weight.

As for the rest, I’m going to try a combination of portion control and diet cat food. Duke lost nearly five pounds in six months. Kili and Toby need to both lose a couple of pounds, at least. Romeo is a big cat. I don’t think he’s fat, but I suppose he can slim down a bit, too.

Maybe in several months I can get our total down below 100 pounds.

We’ll see.

→ No CommentsTags:

Documents from latest campaign spending lawsuit

August 31st, 2010 · Campaigns, Politics

The lawsuit filed on behalf of A-1 A-lectrian Inc. against the Campaign Spending Commission finally made it into the federal court’s online system.

I’ve made the full complaint available here.

In the lawsuit, A-1 says it should not have to register as a political committee in order to make campaign-related expenditures, should not be subject to reporting of its spending for “electioneering communication, should not have to include a disclaimer on any published campaign ads saying whether they are with or without the candidate’s approval or authority, wants to overturn the ban on contributions by government contractors, and should not be subject to the $1,000 per election limit on contributions to another political committee.

A-1 includes copies of a series of advertisements it plans to publish attacking Rep. Blake Oshiro for his role in passage of HB444 relating to civil unions (click here to see the proposed ads–#1, #2, #3).

I just downloaded the files this morning, so haven’t yet had a chance to read through the full complaint. More later.

→ 13 CommentsTags:

Tax on retail newspaper sales questioned

August 31st, 2010 · Media

A reader asks this interesting question:

I’ve thought that newspapers at the retail store level were exempt from our excise tax because of federal statute that blocks certain sales taxes, i.e. “Newspapers and magazines are exempt from sales tax as are legal tender.”

I don’t pay any excise tax when I buy a New York Times or Wall Street Journal at any supermarket or even Stanley’s Convenience Store. But Barnes & Noble charges me the 4.5 percent.

So who’s right? Perhaps one of your readers knows.

If you have an answer, please leave a comment below.

→ 10 CommentsTags:

Be very afraid: Campaign Spending law faces major legal challenge

August 30th, 2010 · Campaigns, Politics

If you happened to miss this story over the weekend, go back and read it (“Firm fights campaign laws“).

Bottom line: A leading conservative attorney representing a local electrical company is challenging Hawaii’s campaign laws in an attempt to eliminate both limits on spending by corporations and any reporting of their campaign expenditures and contributions.

If successful, it will have a devastating impact on Hawaii campaigns and set up similar challenges elsewhere.

The attorney, James Bopp Jr.

According to the New York Times in January 2010:

Mr. Bopp won his biggest victory last week when the Supreme Court ruled that corporations, unions and nonprofit groups have the right to spend as much as they want supporting or opposing the election of a candidate.

Mr. Bopp was not present in the courtroom. His client — not for the first time — replaced him with a less ideological and more experienced Washington lawyer when the case reached the justices.

But it was Mr. Bopp who had first advised the winning plaintiff, the conservative group Citizens United, about using its campaign-season film “Hillary: The Movie” as a deliberate test of the limits on corporate political spending. And he shepherded the case through appeals to the Supreme Court as part of a long-term legal strategy that he says he has just begun.

“We had a 10-year plan to take all this down,” he said in an interview. “And if we do it right, I think we can pretty well dismantle the entire regulatory regime that is called campaign finance law.”

According to Wikipedia: “He has served as the general counsel for National Right to Life since 1978 and as the special counsel for Focus on the Family since 2004.”

Again, from the NY Times:

Mr. Bopp said the next step in his 10-year plan is to roll back the disclosure rules.

“Groups have to be relieved of reporting their donors if lifting the prohibition on their political speech is going to have any meaning,” he said. Requiring groups that buy political commercials to report their donors is almost as punitive, he said, “as an outright criminal go-to-jail-time prohibition.”

The problem for the state is who will defend the law? If left in the hands of the Attorney General, it seems to me that we’re in big trouble.

In any case, the plaintiff: A-1 A-lectrician Inc.

Chairman and CEO, James Yamada Jr., took over the company his father started.

From an author’s note on his book, “God’s Hand in the life of an Electrician“:

Jimmy experienced a radical conversion to Jesus Christ after an intense “God directed” search. He is married to Diana. They are members of First Assembly of God, Red Hill. Jimmy is the Chairman of the Board of Hawaii Youth For Christ, Surf the Nations, Mission China and is on the Advisory Council of Jesus Christ Is Calling You, Inc. He is also the a pastor of at Hawaii Cedar Church in Honolulu, Hawaii.

According to the Star-Advertiser story:

A-1, the lawsuit claims, also wants to donate $2,500 to the Aloha Family Alliance political action committee but is unable because of the $1,000 donation limit.

Here are the political contributions A-1 has reported since 2008, according to the Campaign Spending Commission:

11/3/2009 Hawaii Republican Party $5,000

10/28/2009 Mufi Hannemann $3,000

10/28/2009 Marcus Oshiro $1,000

7/28/2009 Mike Gabbard $2,000

10/16/2008 Mufi Hannemann $2,000

10/16/2008 Gene Ward $500

In my view, the suit is very likely to strike down the ban on contributions by contractors who do business with the state because it appears broader than necessary to achieve the stated goal of controlling “pay to play”.

From the Star-Advertiser:

State lawmakers passed the ban on political donations by state and county contractors in 2005 to discourage what is known as “pay to play,” where contractors make campaign contributions in hopes of winning state and county bids. The ban came after several campaign-finance scandals involving engineering and construction firms.

This year, lawmakers considered relaxing the ban to only cover nonbid contractors, but the move was opposed by open-government advocates.

“The contractor provision was passed to stop the ‘pay to play’ system,” said state Rep. Sylvia Luke (D, Pacific Heights-Pauoa-Punchbowl), who was among the lawmakers who drafted the law. “As we try to instill integrity into politics, this was one of the things that we looked at.”

The lawsuit claims A-1, which has government contracts, wants to make $250 donations to several candidates this year but is unable because of the ban. The lawsuit argues that the candidates do not decide whether A-1 gets government contracts or oversee those contracts.

A copy of the lawsuit was not available from the federal court’s PACER system over the weekend. I’ll post a copy as soon as it is available.

→ 10 CommentsTags:

Hannemann and Aiona battle for Christian votes

August 29th, 2010 · Campaigns, Politics

It’s Sunday, and perhaps an appropriate time to check out the latest from the Hawaii Christian Coalition.

I’m not sure which aspect is most interesting/disturbing. There’s the description of the Hanneman campaign’s attempt to persuade Christians to cross over and vote for him in the primary, and pushback from the GOP

It has come to my attention that Christians are being courted by Ken Wong of the Mufi Hannemann Campaign for Governor into thinking that Christians should vote in September 18th’s Primary Election on the Democrat ballot for Mufi Hannemann to retard the chances of a Neil Abercrombie win rather than supporting Duke Aiona through both the primary and general elections. I have been anguishing over those who believe that there is PURITY OF INTENT behind this strategy since hearing about it 3-4 weeks ago from a close pastor friend. I have delved in the Word and consulted many of my Christian mentors and counselors. I cannot find righteousness in this approach and certainly it is coming from a campaign that has conducted itself unethically, immorally, and far below reproach as we have seen with its recent comparison mail piece.

.

There’s the clear description that Aiona’s campaign is defined primarily in terms of self-defined Christians against the rest of us, seen as “the unrighteous enemy.”

We need to fearlessly, like David did Goliath, run towards the unrighteous enemy. Duke Aiona’s Campaign for Governor is the Body of Christ’s opportunity to operate in the AUTHORITY and to be proactive.

Then there’s the realization that this long missive with its bible quotes, talk of the “Kingdom”, and accusations that union political endorsements constitution an “unholy OATH”, comes from Republican State Chair, Jonah Kaauwai and is simply being redistributed by the Christian Coalition.

With more than 400,000 Christians in the State of Hawaii, WE are responsible no matter what the outcome of Duke’s race because we have been given the POWER and the AUTHORITY in the NAME OF JESUS!!!!

God bless you all! If you have any questions do not hesitate to call me on my personal cellular, 620-5702.

Aloha ke Akua — Jonah

Jonah Ka’auwai, Chairman
Hawaii Republican Party

Separation of Church and State?

That’s obviously not what these folks believe.

→ 53 CommentsTags: