i L i n d . n e t

Ian Lind online daily from Kaaawa, Hawaii

i L i n d . n e t header image 2

City Ethics Chair resigns to avoid violation of ban on political activities

May 17th, 2010 · 12 Comments · Campaigns, Politics

The chairman of the Honolulu Ethics Commission has resigned from the commission in order to avoid potential legal questions stemming from his participation in political campaigns.

Ethics commission members are permitted to vote and to make campaign contributions, but any further political activity or support for or against any candidate is strictly prohibited. The mayor is required to immediately remove any member of the commission who violates this prohibition.

Honolulu attorney Lex Smith said today he resigned as commission chair last month after being asked to assist Managing Director Kirk Caldwell’s mayoral campaign. Smith said he resigned “when the situation was reaching a point where I was likely to be in violation.”

Smith’s letter of resignation is dated April 22, 2010. The last advisory opinion posted at the commission’s web site that Smith signed as chair is dated April 8, 2010.

Smith said he does not believe his previous involvement in Caldwell’s campaign, as well as those of Mayor Mufi Hannemann and former mayor Jeremy Harris, have put him in violation.

Smith’s political activities appear to extend back to his initial appointment to the commission nearly a decade ago. Smith was first appointed to the ethics commission by then-Mayor Jeremy Harris in 2001. He was reappointed by Mayor Hannemann in 2007.

Records show Smith has been actively involved in the campaigns of both Mayor Mufi Hannemann and Managing Director Kirk Caldwell while serving as a member of the commission. He earlier took actions as a supporter of Harris.

• Smith personally represented Hannemann’s campaign before the State Campaign Spending Commission in proceedings last year seeking to block Neil Abercrombie from transferring money from his federal campaign fund to his campaign for governor, commission minutes show. Hannemann campaign records show Smith’s law firm (Kobayashi, Sugita & Goda) was paid $21,000 following the Campaign Spending Commission’s decision.

“In my mind, at least, although I acted as the lawyer for various politicians over the years, I did not participate in their campaigns,” Smith said. “I have represented them as their counsel. In my view, I don’t think that violates the ethics rules.”

• Records show Smith was reimbursed by the Hannemann campaign in June 2009 for two expenditures, $78.55 for “fundraiser food” and $750 for “fundraiser entertainment”.

A “Notice of intent to hold a fundraiser” filed by Hannemann’s campaign for a $1,000 per person fundraiser on June 27, 2009, lists the person in charge of the fundraiser as Bert T. Kobayashi, Jr., senior partner in Smith’s law firm.

Smith insists his involvement was proper.

“If I recall correctly, I think I bought a cake,” Smith said, “and I paid for the band at the same fundraiser.”

“I view that the same as making a campaign contribution,” Smith said.

• Earlier this year, Smith telephoned this writer on behalf of Managing Director Kirk Caldwell’s campaign to clarify something he had been told was reported here.

• In 2008, Smith, described in news reports as a supporter of then-City Council candidate Kirk Caldwell, filed a challenge with the City Clerk seeking to clarify the legality of Caldwell’s nomination papers.

• In 2002, Smith successfully sued the campaign spending commission seeking to reverse a ruling that limited fundraising by Harris.

“I was on the ethics commission when I sued Bob Watada,” Smith said. “In my view, although I was personally the plaintiff, that involved my right to give money, which the charter said was exempted.”

The relevant city ordinance provides:

Sec. 3-6.9 Prohibiting political management or activity or candidacy to an elective political office.

(a) Except for exercising the right to vote or making a campaign contribution to a candidate for elective public office, no member of the ethics commission shall support, advocate or aid in, or manage, the election or defeat of any candidate for public office. No member of the ethics commission shall be a candidate for any elective public office nor engage in campaigning for such office.

(b) Any member of the ethics commission who violates the provisions of this section shall be removed by the mayor forthwith since such person serves at the pleasure of the mayor. (Sec. 3-2.9, R.O. 1978 (1987 Supp. to 1983 Ed.); Am. Ord. 01-51)

Charles “Chuck” Totto, ethics commission executive director, declined to discuss the resignation, referring questions to Smith.

Totto said the restrictions on political activities are discussed with new commission appointees as part of their orientation, but rarely come up at other times.

Tags: ···

12 Comments so far ↓

Subscribe to comments on this post via RSS-2.0 feed

  • Curious

    Ian,
    Just curious as to why you think a blogger like yourself would warrant a return phone call about an issue you are writing about. I know your followers will scream hell yeah but seriously…in the overall scheme of things, what makes your blog of any significance? Just seems to me that somewhere along the line you decided to self annoint yourself.

    • ohiaforest3400

      Uh, Ian didn’t do any “self-annointing.” It was SMITH who called HIM on behalf of Caldwell, thus engaging in prohibited political management or activity. Duh.

  • Susan Chamberlain

    Bravo! Thanks for your reporting.

  • Nikki Heat

    @Curious As a resident, when I call a public official — whether elected or appointed — I expect a response (and if I leave a message, I expect a call back). I would think the expectation of a response from our government (and the folks who we pay to provide services) has little to do with whether Ian is a former investigative reporter cum blogger.

  • Kathleen

    Bravo Nikki Heat!

    Do you think the State Ethics Commission could weigh in on the City Ethics Commission? ; >

    I served briefly on the State Ethics Commission and it was very clear what we as commissioners could or could not do regarding political activities.

    • ohiaforest3400

      State Ethics Commission applies Hawaii Revised Statutes, City Ethics Commission applies Revised Ordinances of Honolulu. The former has no jurisdiction over the latter; never the twain shall meet.

  • Bill

    Great reporting. Thanks Mr. Lind

    and for the “Curious” types out there … you should know that while you can wish all you want. you can’t control or bully people by your old paradigms

  • curious

    old paradigms or not MR. Bill…..the facts don’t lie. even if we give Ian’s site the “benefit of the doubt”….do the math dude. How many “visitors” by how many days in a year and you get a few hundred a day. Back to my point of “in the scheme the things”. not that much especially in light of other media. even the much talked about civil beat…all 3 or 4 hundred of them equals ian.com but he is free….not meaning to be disrespectful to Ian…cuz he comes up with some interesting points to discuss. just sayin…..in the scheme of things….aloha.

    • ohiaforest3400

      As I said above, it is Mr. Smith’s actions that re in question, not Ian’s:

      “Uh, Ian didn’t do any “self-annointing.” It was SMITH who called HIM on behalf of Caldwell, thus engaging in prohibited political management or activity. Duh.”

  • wlsc

    @ curious
    What’s your point?

    Does an entity (a blogger, a newspaper) need to pass a critical threshold of readers in order to deserve a response from a public servant or office?

    Are public servants or offices excused from responding to requests for comment or information if they determine that their answers will only reach “3 or 4 hundred” citizens?

  • Bill

    so I guess we can sum up Curious’s point as he doesn’t think this site or the work of the reporter here is that important — he certainly is entitled to that view, but what is the point of expressing it here?

    my conclusion is that he is a troll — nonetheless, I appreciate that his viewpoint was posted — now I can put him on my own personal ignore

  • BadCredenza

    Back to Mr. Smith. As he is an attorney, aren’t his actions also governed by lawyering rules and could conflict of action behavior be reason for an inquiry by Hawaii State Bar Association?

Leave a Comment

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree